China is misreading Obama

 China is misreading Obama
media stir recently put pressure on Obama regarding the appreciation of the RMB exchange rate. However, careful analysis, that the media exaggerated the facts. Obama did not propaganda, as some people appreciation of the yuan exchange rate as tough.
Chinese officials and some experts and scholars and the media has one voice against the United States a series of Chinese products from the tax (including customs duties, anti-dumping duties, countervailing duties,UGGs, etc.) judged to be ; trade protectionism. China's exports, and expand U.S. exports.
It is also engaged in trade protectionism in the United States based on judgments, China has taken a number of Ministry of Commerce announced the U.S. anti-dumping investigations chicken of fat and a preliminary ruling, the United States ruled that the respondent companies were dumping margins ranging from 43.1-80.5%,UGG shoes, the company is not responding to the dumping margin is 105.4%. the Commerce Department found in the preliminary ruling, in the case the survey period, imports originating in the United States dumping white feather chicken products, the domestic broiler industry has been substantial white feather damage, between the dumping and material injury and causal relationship. Since February 13, 2010, the import in the import business operators originating in the United States, white feather chicken products should be based on the preliminary decision identified in the company's dumping margin to the General Administration of Customs corresponding margin.
2008 since the second half, foreign to China's foreign trade is not set fewer obstacles. despite the crisis led to the decline in import capacity, the development of national industries to solve the employment, for understandable reasons, but we do not intentionally create a disaster for China, so the overcapacity, a decline in employment, corporate bankruptcies, the intention of social chaos . In fact, in the long run, China's foreign trade developed countries can not give up the enormous benefits to them and can not play perfect in the true development of their manufacturing, they want China to become the world's factory, hopes to spend resources ,UGG boots, the industrial pollution of the environment to stay in China, by China's cheap labor to them continue to provide the cheapest and high quality products, but on the other hand the high price of the products exported to China, both inside and outside China's disadvantage. < br> So how to understand the developed countries impose high tariffs on our exports, anti-dumping duties, countervailing duties, carbon tariffs? Does not that developed countries no longer want to import products from China, the What?
many experts only from Assessing the trade protectionism of developed countries act. the problem is not so simple. not so much the purpose of taxation is to developed countries, long-term reduction of imports from China, as that developed countries is to create country has sights on China's economic dependence on foreign trade, saw the country by raising the export tax rebate rate will be in the form of export subsidies, so they dare to tax on China's export products. In the context of high tariffs, China's exports does not affect the export business to sell products in the market, to export products to lower prices in the international market. And in order not to loss of export enterprises, China's government to export enterprises to improve the export tax rebate rate and other financial subsidies. Some experts have even suggested that by raising the export tax rebate rate of developed countries to deal with tax policy. Thus, formed. On the surface, China's financial subsidies to the Chinese exporters, in fact, the benefits of China's financial subsidies do not allow our exporters, but rather into the pockets of governments in developed countries. Therefore, developed countries, taxation The real intent is not to trade protection, but the international financial transfers. developed a heavy debt burden,UGG boots clearance, fiscal deficits remain high, the debt crisis becoming more evident. through international transfer payments, the developed countries to a certain extent, ease their financial difficulties. developed countries from international trade with developing countries to extract huge benefits: imports of cheap goods and exports high-priced goods, financial international transfer payments, which amounts to cruel exploitation of the developed countries to developing countries, share the fruits of economic development in developing countries . As long as this tax Therefore, we must unswervingly carried out in 2010, economic restructuring, and unswervingly the trade-dependent economy to a domestic demand-dependent changes in the economy, and unswervingly to adjust foreign trade structure, firmly to prevent high energy consumption, low resource utilization, low value-added, low wages, low prices of exports to imports and exports to, in the principle of mutual benefit, the export process that produce non-polluting, low energy consumption, high resource utilization, high value-added, high prices, foreign not their own products, imports are of urgent need, they can not produce, or does not pay their production of the product, while the development of import substitution production and reduce imports of high value items. for valuable strategic resource of products, to ban exports, contrary to import to increase strategic reserves. our long-term low-cost export of rare earth resources, with no difference between selling out the country. 2009 lower price of crude oil and refined oil exports, but also wrong. to narrow the scope of financial subsidies, only to support those who need short-term and long-term high returns with the development of future high-tech industry and short-term support and long-term benefit and then monopolizing the international market to increase prices to subsidize the industry.
developed countries on products from the United States and Europe without the necessary subsidies and dumping? In my opinion little significance. the one hand, China is a surplus countries, while the United States and Europe is the deficit countries, their scope of anti-dumping large, but they do not have much for you to anti-dumping; the other hand, China's export products are really very cheap is simply equal to the given foreign country, the long run, China is extremely negative, resources will be exhausted early, and U.S. and European countries did not intend to sell you a bargain. if dumping United States and Europe to China is really, then dumping it China on the one hand to prevent the United States and Europe to take the first elimination of the related industries, a substantial price increase after the policy (this is unlikely), on the other hand they are welcome in our country dumping the things we need (I am afraid they do not foolish).
The appreciation of the renminbi, we do not have in accordance with the impossible for the United States inhibit the heart of China exports to revalue its currency. If the United States withdrew from a large number of Chinese, it does have a possible revaluation of the yuan.