Mr. Mao Yushi, substituting one concept to see how the

 Mr. Mao Yushi, substituting one concept to see how the
can not be time, so first let me say hello to friends.
the time when this is not a good debate, but having watched Maoxian Sheng's issued a This common sense, the public's eyes are discerning. does not need me to more of this mouth. but to see care for the young, Maoxian Sheng is a senior this year, 80 years old, is already Diemao of the year. that age are still concerned about the affairs, but it is also admired the younger generation. However, according to Confucius, said the standard of Chinese traditional virtues mm not breaking the rules. Charter challenge to China's system of a certain bottom line. He obviously did not hear the words of Confucius, then the younger generation does not need to mark territory; Also frequently from Maoxian Sheng Wang of the phenomenon, I am willing to believe that there is no group of people behind him, such as certain funds used the money will produce the article, and then hang a name Maoxian Sheng. So, Mao Xiansheng energy level and logical ability is unquestioned, therefore, since he assumed the ring, ready to do Leizhu, it should also be ready to The debate.
despite hesitation, finally I decided to respond to Maoxian Sheng, or that he rose to the problem of , all packets into Chinese and foreigners, that I not only think as a younger person, but also as a citizen, as a person, whether active or passive, are the board of the man, can get out .
most important is that it involves the basic concepts of contemporary Chinese society and the basic contradictions, they are not to be confused, if confused, then the future will become clearer the truth, and will be the public that the concept of po po said the concept of public that justified, rational woman and she said, increasingly popular anger is inevitable, and even water and fire can not be compatible to the old grandfathers and grandmothers had to be torn society mm divorce situation, all are losers.
not to idea, nothing wrong; but if it is widely disseminated, that the scholar model, and even influence public opinion-oriented interests of the game, you can not fail to discrimination: first, Mao Xiansheng define how to do things for the poor? He said in the article: They go to school, doctor, building low-cost housing, small loans, small loans with low interest rates, set a high minimum wage, lower college tuition required to create the rich take the poor people ride the policy to allow the poor deceived. release logic, then the Bangladeshi economist Muhammad. Yunus led by Mao Xiansheng low interest micro-credit is not the standard Nobel Peace Prize is also sent to the wrong.
there Maoxian Sheng against know, around the minimum wage has never been more than 1,000 yuan, Maoxian Sheng admitted: pressing problems of workers the boss. annual per capita income of $ 37,600, 1 / 23, if the income per unit time, taking into account the working time of migrant workers in China than the United States is about twice the length of labor, agricultural and industrial units of income in China is only the Americans 1 / 46. If in accordance with Mao Xiansheng view, this is reasonable, is determined by market supply. of course, small loans can not lower interest rates, market supply is determined, as are determined by market supply, then the market are profit-making behavior, then Maoxian Sheng for the poor can do it? donated money for the poor, or take a Yupeng to soup kitchens do?
labor income and in improving working and living environment, Mao Xiansheng that everything is left to the market since Well, then do not do anything for the labor necessary for the real facts. And the question of labor income, Maoxian Sheng is a decision, not the boss of squeezing workers. because in the process of rapid urbanization, a large number of rural labor to urban migration. supply and demand determines the price rise does not go up. but this is unlikely to continue, and with the the future relationship between labor supply and demand changes in the price of labor will certainly go up. now already have the signs, I guess in the next five to ten years will change over. yuan labor in the short term do not expect a raise, though in the past 10 years, China Forbes barriers to entry have been turned I do not know itself, despite the outbreak of the world recognized the speed of China is the world's richest ever, despite the poverty in China Rich Engel coefficient of differentiation has fallen dramatically to the internationally accepted warning line below. rich and labor income can be up is not necessary to pay up!
why this 10-year wages of workers in China the situation is not up? Why This rapid expansion of China's rich-poor divide it? excessive labor supply is actually a superficial reason. But even more important source is that the various elements of productivity, capital of the natural properties of the most concentrated, labor is the most dispersed, according to purely social Darwinism (the jungle law of nature), capitalists are all easily defeated the labor, and thus the pressure in the low labor wages have been the state. it will become increasingly greedy capitalists, and workers increasingly depressed, rich and poor growing gap between the psychological gap between the more and more, and finally unable to endure and resist the labor and nature is the result. The fundamental solution is just to allow workers to form trade unions to elect true representatives of trade unions to represent their interests to the collective way with the management on the productivity levels of other elements of the negotiations, resulting in labor income growth and corporate profits growth and social growth of the total wealth of power-sharing synchronization.
why, why did not the formation of the Chinese workers and employers through equal consultation and collective bargaining the situation? There are many reasons, one important reason is that, like Mao Xiansheng that anyone who speaks for the rich too much, take a look at the Economists have a say how anxious to know. The RMB appreciation, export tax rebates for the sharp decline was a sharp surge in international prices of raw materials such as on the enormous destruction of Chinese enterprises, they often turn a blind eye, and for the workers security point of power, add a little anxious as the sky is falling wages for the same.
Maoxian Sheng is the name of graphic market behavior, even if we all do for the poor when he was wrong, but he was able to , Most of all understand, in order to maximize the interests of access to wealth, the most intelligent approach is to obtain rules of the game to their advantage making power, can not leak quietly sensual to the appropriation of other people's wealth redistribution. formulated rules of the game to win initiative, the most crucial is the right to speak, that is, the public media to find those who have voice and influence policy-making speak for themselves, speak for themselves, so that decision-making and public sentiment to go along with their own interests.
and Meanwhile, some academics have little rich little you probably also understand, for the poor to speak up to get some reputation, there is no pecuniary interest in affordable; and is profitable for the wealthy to speak, there is a sponsor, how to speak for the wealthy will thankless? Of course, if the good is the people's trust and appreciation, they are not natural, and may the good service if the object of his pecuniary interest, that is not hard to get . like Mao Xiansheng concluded mm red and get rid of 18 million mu of land privatization project is sponsored by the Ford Foundation to accept the same. I do not know the sponsor the extent of impact on the conclusions, but at least I know that mu red line is a racking our brains out, out? does the state decision-makers even this simple math addition and subtraction multiplication and division are not counted. phrase has been seriously inconsistent with common sense, then, inevitably reminiscent of the Chinese saying goes mm ;, or otherwise considered illegal.
broken red line is broken 18 million mu of the survival of the Chinese people who can deny the bottom line
mm broken red line and supporting 18 million mu of land behind the huge privatization policy interests.
18 million mu of land privatization and the broken red line, who get great benefits? not a farmer, because once the privatization of land, the land rights of farmers coercion predatory behavior will be endless, it is one after another round of Chinese history had happened, the farmers sell the land but did not get the money owed the money to buy land landlord phenomenon too much. in the event of the You can count on private ownership of land farmers can get a fair price to sell you?
now actively promoting the privatization of land forces farmers to maintain the name of the person under the banner of land prices. Yes, now farmland conversion to nonagricultural Government acquisition of agricultural land cheap and then sold to the city's developers at high prices, but not a large proportion of this money into the national security, the farmers have no social security authority, of which indeed there is a huge loophole, must be reformed. the correct approach to reform is the mm transfer of land directly to the developer community a direct listing on the auction, a reasonable division of land sales in the farmers, universal social security, urban low-rent housing and the government retained percentage. The ratio between the proportion of overall social security should be large farmers in land sales, land sales should be more than urban low-rent housing peasants, urban low-rent housing should be retained is greater than the government.
land if the distribution of benefits because of a technical problem and destroy the red line and 18 million mu of land owned . it is like down the bath water, and the bath is drained with the same child. If it was destroyed 18 million acres of red, land privatization, then who is truly the best interests of those who do?
mm business owners are indirectly the interests of labor cost control. Because the privatization of land means that farmers displaced by the free transfer began, more and more farmers lost their land, into the cities to become cheaper surplus labor, the labor market supply and demand in accordance with Mao Xiansheng theory, workers in China the price of 1,000 yuan, not only will last 3-5 years, 10-20 years I think they have no hope of a raise.
mm for direct real estate developers are huge benefits can be cheap get a large number of land, continue to build a house, and the more rich and powerful are larger enclosure, the lower land prices, the greater the profits space.
mm those of the world's food giant enterprises will gain the greatest benefits. the privatization of land for U.S. multinational agricultural giants in China staking, clearing the way for large-scale mechanized farming. They will be genetically modified seeds, pesticides and fertilizers copy the pattern matching to China, China will be destroyed Cuikulaxiu camel existing agricultural model. you know, this new model does not improve the number of agricultural yields, a well known fact that the world rice yield record has now rests in the hands of the Chinese Yuan Longping. In other words, it increased agricultural farmers no good income, or benefits are limited, but will greatly improve the farmers the seeds, fertilizer and pesticide costs, reducing net income of Chinese farmers.
for agriculture because multinational corporations have greatly improved the efficiency of farming, will also be greatly pushed out the farmers land. If China meet U.S. standards, China's farmers need only enough for 1.75 million (U.S. agricultural population of 3.5 million now, China's total arable land is about 2 times), now about 7.5 million farmers in China the vast majority will leave their homes to the city to absorb. If Chinese farmers leaving only less than 200 million people, even if the income of each farmer up to 10 times (this is not possible to Maoxian Sheng emphasized labor supply and demand, monthly salary of a city thousands of migrant workers, rural farmers how can 1 million? Of course such a hypothesis is to envisage the benefits of intensive agriculture the full number), the consumption rate and now the same is not reduced, the consumption power in rural China only about 2000 people total spending, which means that the total consumer demand in rural China will be reduced 97.3%, or equivalent to the current 1 / 37. This will be the expansion of domestic demand, domestic demand or decrease it? also ask if you really Maoxian Sheng mm will be 7.4 million farmers in rural areas torrent released, how to solve their living and development space, arrange them so many jobs. and then ask some time ago, the export processing enterprises have been closed down, laid-off migrant workers return home as well mu possidetis this, have something to eat, if their land, and agricultural income are multinational agricultural giants laps to go, they did for a living?! be responsible for the trouble you go wrong Maoxian Sheng?
If you cancel 18 million mu of red line and the implementation of the privatization of land and let the market to free competition, the result would be strong for the king, winner-take-all, less than 10 years, the international food giants will dominate and control China's food industry, China's food supply will Multinational food giant by domestic and international dual control in food prices, which the Chinese people's basic rights to subsistence food supply are no longer in their own hands. as in 2008 in front of us, the international food prices soaring, short-term doubled in prices, making many countries in Asia and Africa into famine and unrest among the, you know, this is the 1.3 billion Chinese people was no shortage of food occurs, if at that time also appeared in China's food shortage, national markets had to buy, prices do not rise to heaven!
In other words, in 2008, if not we insist on the 18 million mu of red, we do not mind the hands of a food panic, no survival of the public panic, we may have a major crisis in international financial markets in the fall. a well-known American strategist, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger had a famous saying: control of the human. Food giant hands is the Chinese people lucky? If the former reason, the time to read the proposed Maoxian Sheng Yan, Mr. Doyle, the Good cover up the struggle against the rich and evil rich
watch Maoxian Sheng throughout the article, to and fro from the thinking that you are few people speak very brave mean. assigned to most of the poor, and then just keep worried mm , First of all, the sound from the network media is not just the voice of the poor, according to the level of material in China, the poorest of the poor can not afford a computer, not on the network. online to comment on the sum of many, in fact, closer to public opinion, at least in today's China is the closest to the views of the public. I know some of the central leaders of regular Internet users just do not know whether they will occasionally thread; the rich have the power of the Internet to speak, they lack time, but can also spend money hiring people to speak their own, as well as meet their own interests to defend the remarks after the thread; there are many more white-collar middle class, there are urban public, a student, of course, there are migrant workers, but not the General Assembly Maoxian Sheng This is the recognized voice of the public. If so, would not put themselves in the opposite side of public opinion? view of this, with defend the method.
with the poor, hatred of the rich mentality.
but for the time being suffice! because there really are two very important definition interchange, public opinion about the social network for the poor public opinion was stolen; the second is to view public comments on its position Authority for the poor steal the rich for the opposition and hatred mm due to the poor work, or do very little work to do, not work, only count words), he was condemned by a solemn and reasonable. The first I have altered the idea of the text argument in the preceding paragraph, after a substitution of concept of public opinion (in Maoxian Sheng eyes of the poor) is the natural hatred of the rich, of the general public unlawful non-rational exploitation of wealth and riches of others who are in the eyes of the , the masses have sharp eyes, not only to take hostile eyes jealous of the rich, but not any support. in the first half, a tabloid published an article in Hunan, a visit from the Yuan Longping Motor Show to expand the imagination, said Mr. Yuan, six, seven cars, but also buy more advanced vehicles and so on. In this report six or seven vehicles proved to be non-existent before the network even behind Longping comprehensive public opinion, public opinion overwhelmingly believe that, do not say sixty-seven cars, is to give Yuanlao should buy a plane is, he is the safety of Chinese made food to survive significant contribution to solve the food problem of mankind has made a significant contribution to its direct contribution to social wealth, is one hundred billion yuan to dollars, because such a big contribution to how to enjoy not be overstated. Of course, hindsight, Yuanlao is restraint, not a lot to enjoy, he is no rhetoric to practice their own actions contribute to the community for maximizing the contribution of human values. Maoxian Sheng Yuan Lao values obviously not the same as, Maoxian Sheng has his values that sum it up: people alive is to enjoy life,
Vanke second example is the realization of employee equity incentive plans. In the past public opinion on the loss of state assets and the operator holding a lot of criticism, which is usually Maoxian Sheng-style as is the hatred of the rich from the poor. However, in 2007, Vanke implementation of equity incentive plan operators to pre-announced capital markets and investors with all the details, get public opinion and network support for a wide range of public opinion, although caused the individual to discuss technical details, but said that public opinion received overwhelming support. The fundamental reason is the program fair and transparent, is reasonable, and the operation, the company, investors and capital markets and win-win. from the above two cases, we can break the indignation definition interchange, will be the same as hatred of the rich the poor, it will seriously harm infinite, its harmonious society and scientific development of mass destruction is also less than 18 million mu of broken red line. because it obscures the real principal contradiction in China today mm good wrestling rich and evil rich.
back in November 2002, I wrote an article called growth. Good personal wealth while the rich, rich people drive, and work together for the community to create more wealth. China's productive forces, which has been upgraded, they are formed in the Chinese market a force for the process to become positive Chinese society the power to create wealth. At the same time, due to defects in the existing institutional rigidity, because the reform and opening up its own exploration, the reforms in place in order to avoid a violent social upheaval caused by the progressive has introduced various reform measures two-track system the objective elements for a number of bureaucratic corruption provides an opportunity. their social collusion of some speculative capital, money, riches with Chinese black class, they are the ugly in the process of market forces. The basic characterized by the destruction of national and personal riches is more wealth at the expense of the public, this forces l crony capitalism that is, they are formed r. destruction of wealth in today's China forces. motive in the Chinese society forever stuck in a trading power and capital to maximize the stage, stop the truly open, fair and equitable market-oriented reforms and obstruct China's modern architecture of the realization of a mature market; they attempt to always be in Chinese society as their ATM two-track stage, often preventing people based on national positions and emotional value of the real orientation of the reform, attempts to create wealth for those who continue to deprive the sacred fruits of reform and opening as well as misappropriation of people the fruits of the struggle ahead. And the people because ; the fog, often countries in transition, reform and opening up the rich by evil forces to destroy wealth leads to evil, simply comes down to market-oriented reform body. important conflicts are two important reasons not to contest the power of tit for tat, the stage of life and death battle. The trial of two forces now reached a very acute stage, if further deterioration, it may lead to social unrest, the financial crisis and stock market disaster, no matter what kind are likely to subvert China's social progress, the great rejuvenation of the nation. to curb the power of wealth destruction in the contest between the two occupy the absolute upper hand. more and more serious, a force for wealth creation will receive more and more repression, more and more Chinese will inevitably intensify social contradictions, one day, lost the survival and development of people want to break out, and social turmoil, The first victim is wealthy. Even if the evil rich who fled to a foreign country can only be marginalized and despised the local people.
Fortunately, Mao Xiansheng or agreed that do not include corruption, theft, abuse of power, those who pursue ill-gotten gains. cover in an objective and transfer of the public on the pride in the kind of elite, he wrote: a stable political governance must be elite, because the governance of a country is very complex, there must be versed in issues related to governance experts, not their culture, not high quality people can not assume this responsibility. it is easy to put a lot of people's views, even views of the majority of people classified as . However, it must be clear that the can barely be counted. If the elite are identified by Mao Xiansheng, I am not interested in joining the elite squad. I do not know who has the power recognized the .
Maoxian Sheng wrote: let the elite for the whole country, to consider the interests of society, also need a good system design, this system is democracy. It would appear that the definition of democracy is not people are the masters, but also not the people's democratic process, but not the people's supervision, but rather elite fundamental human rights system species that is Sina on December 26 for the Financial
Mao Yushi, (26), Mao Yushi is the first time in days, the author of Economic Research web site hit back, and to accept part of the problem exclusively on Reuters dialogue.
There are concrete facts and figures to support, and hope you will not hear me curse opposed to 18 million mu of red should be careful to understand and then make evaluations on our research, I believe time will prove that our report can be reliability. journalists attend the conference, and other ideas to issues think-tank said in a clear, day is concluded, Many call him the letter.
Mao Yushi, issued a document today that said the offending was criticized because the fundamental interests of some people, but they could not speak truth, so he had to criticize the way. control, control of the people on the right is a matter of great interest. With control you will have to approve, so there is abuse of power of the opportunity to right the money exchange. precisely because the matter involved a huge interest, so there are so strong curse the sound. relationship between cultivated land and grain yield of debate
critics argue that food grown in the land, but also by about land, food production and land area are necessarily related, reduction of land will certainly lead to less food, so reducing the practice of land is completely wrong!
response to this criticism, Mao Yushi said the lack of serious food problems of their thinking on food-related data with no research.
He said that land is only one of the reasons affecting food production, like labor, fertilizer, irrigation, agricultural mechanic, and also affect food production. , the hard fact that arable land and food production has nothing to do. argument, the State Council think-tank questioned in a rural issues, In the ensuing debate triggered by the primary, according to the mainstream, many people in China after the reduction of arable land to challenge the safety of food.
Mao Yushi told Sina Finance, 200 million tons this figure is not accurate, annual trading volume of 270 million tons worldwide. , about fifty million tons. if all depended on imports make up, to use foreign exchange of about 100 million, less than one percent of China's exports, even if the condition is a bad three times, only with about three per cent of exports nothing. factors is very large, in practice may not completely follow the laws of economics. On the one hand, food has a longer growth cycle, less immediately after the production process can not say it. On the other hand, the masses are rigid demand for food, a little be a problem soon to panic, and panic will be enlarged. fell food on time, it will be very troublesome. because no one knows why are 18 million mu.